Internet Censorship
Title: Internet Censorship
Category: /Literature/English
Details: Words: 650 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
Internet Censorship
Category: /Literature/English
Details: Words: 650 | Pages: 2 (approximately 235 words/page)
The Children’s Online Protections Act defined “material harmful to minors” as material “appealing to purient interests under current community standards; as depicting or describing sex acts, or a lewd exhibition of genitals or a woman’s breasts; and as lacking ‘serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value for minors.’ “(Thomas). Does this mean that it is fair for the government to decide which web sites are “harmful” and which are not? Whose community standards
showed first 75 words of 650 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 650 total
Rekindles Legal Challenge.”
Technology News 15 Oct. 1998, http://www.techweb.com/wire/
story/TWB19981015S0022
Lessig, Lawrence. “OPINION: Apple’s OS 9 Key to Regulating Porn
Online.” The Industry Standard 10 Dec. 1999,
http://www.cnn.com/ 1999/TECH/computing/12/10/os9.porn.
regulation
Matthews, Stacy. “Porn Restrictions Have a ‘Chilling Effect’ on
‘Net.” The Vermilion 03 Mar. 1996, http://www.louisiana.edu/
NewsPublications/TheVermilion/96_03_15/
Pierre, Thomas. “Judge Delays Internet Porn Restrictions.” CNN
19 Nov. 1998,http://cgi.cn.com/TECH/computing/9811/19/
internet.decency.02/
Nay-1
