Should all Convicted Criminals have their DNA Recorded?
Title: Should all Convicted Criminals have their DNA Recorded?
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 730 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Should all Convicted Criminals have their DNA Recorded?
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 730 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Once convicted criminals have their DNA fingerprints in CrimTrac's database, police are able to identify them faster as suspects, if they re-offend, which saves investigation time. When confronted with DNA evidence, guilty suspects may be more likely to confess and plead guilty, also saving police time and reducing court costs. The DNA database gives Australian police a tool to increase the closure rate of not only serious offences but also high volume crimes such as
showed first 75 words of 730 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 730 total
performs to strict standards to minimize as many errors as possible. Cases are tried and tested by trained professionals, and then the person is either convicted or set free. The database is an obvious benefit to crime fighting in this country and I do not think that countries should be deprived of such technology now because of unlikely “Big Brother”-type concerns for the future that could only occur after numerous drastic changes to legislation.
